Listening to Linkbait

Good ideas come in many shapes and sizes. The ideas that matter, however, are those that are actively evaluated and employed.

Linkbaiting, despite its unseemly name, is an idea that matters. It combines the economics of information on the Internet with the best practice of exceptional customer service. It’s Seth Godin meets Peter Drucker. It drives customers to your website with no variable cost. It quickly connects consumers with information.

Linkbaiting is the umbrella term for the range of techniques that attracts links to your Web site.  And while links of all kinds are the medium of the Web, linkbaiting draws a disproportionately large number of links without cash payment.  Linkbaiting matters because, when done effectively, it drives improvement in search engine ranking, web traffic and visitors.

Here are a few linkbaiting techniques that work (with examples and links to effective linkbait content):

One caution to linkbaiting novices: use linkbaiting for the long run. Getting someone to come to your site once, visit one page and leave disappointed does little for your business. Trick me once, shame on you. Trick me twice, shame on me.

What Optimists Do in 2009

As an enterprise software entrepreneur, American, father, husband and optimist, here is where I’m directing my personal energies in 2009:

Innovate. There is no recession on innovation. Things like economic uncertainty, instability in our financial markets and the housing crisis are widely reported. These developments are clearly depressing but not under our immediate control. That is why I’m continuing to process the depressing information, but focusing my personal creativity, enthusiasm and industry on producing innovative products, services and solutions.

Participate in global and local communities. Web 2.0 has made the world smaller, which is great. Technology has made it easier to communicate, collaborate and transact business around the globe. We are all richer for these new connections. One of the unfortunate by-products of globalization is a “crowding out” of local activities, institutions and businesses. Global is good, but so is local. I’m participating in both spheres.

Contribute your abundance generously. The lessons of early economists remain true today. Specialize. Create value within your specialization. Trade your created value with others for personal and communal enrichment. What do you have in abundance today: time, skill, finances, ideas or something else. Figure out how to get your abundance into circulation.

Manage scarce resources carefully.
Optimism isn’t blind. It’s pragmatic. In a recent San Francisco Chronicle interview Benchmark Capital partner Bill Gurley wisely stated, “in market downturns, frugality is not only a virtue, but also it could be the difference between survival and failure.” Understand what’s scarce. Cash savings, fossil fuels and the environment are under scrutiny in our household.

Improve education. Education is America’s greatest industry. Our universities are coveted around the world and our commitment to providing K-12 education to all residents is one of the greatest public policy practices in human history. Sadly, public education is in need of a strategic overhaul, increased funding, better public relations and increased participation from parents and communities. Every investment I’ve made in education has provided a spectacular economic return and has made me happy. I want the same for my children and everyone’s children.

Comments and contributions to this discussion on optimism are encouraged!

Back to Blogging

Hello 2009. I’m welcoming in the new year by restarting my blogging here at Bill Freedman’s Soon To Be A Major Trend.

My heavy writing, mentoring and community building activities in other venues resulted in a bit of silence here. That’s changed now. You can once again look forward to reading about novel ideas on persuasion, business-to-business marketing, bootstrapping, and growing sustainable businesses right here.

I invite you to take a moment right now to add my RSS feed (https://www.showcasemarketing.com/ideablog/?feed=rss2) to your favorite personal start page, portal or news reader.

Would Your Recommend This Product to a Friend?

Business consulting firms and academics are actively working to quantify the degree to which word of mouth advocacy drives revenue growth in industries ranging from mobile phone networks to automobiles to enterprise software.

Advocacy correlating with revenue growth seems like a reasonable assertion. Word of mouth recommendations should improve sales productivity and reduce the length of sales cycles, both of which improve revenue growth. Alternatively, “bad buzz” will drive potential buyers to seek alternatives. Bain & Company, Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix have jointly copyrighted the term “net promoter score” and formalized the statistical calculations of customer answers to the question “would you recommend this product/brand/company/stock to a friend.”

One recent study published in Brand Strategy confirmed the validity of the Net Promoter Score. Using large sample sizes across multiple industries in the UK, this study confirmed that the “Net Promoter Score” accurately predicts revenue growth (correlation coefficient of 0.484 and significance less than 0.01), and negative word of mouth correlates with reduced revenue growth (correlation coefficient of -0.524 and significance less than 0.01). Wow, that is good evidence…and it’s only one of many studies.

With repeated studies confirming the value behind the Net Promoter Score, it is worth thinking about monitoring this statistic and implementing programs that improve customer referral behavior. A few such programs include:

  • Referral rewards, ranging from service credits to hard cash for customer referrals
  • Free product trials, making it easy to progress from receiving a recommendation to experiencing the product
  • Anointing customers as brand ambassadors, this creates an emotional bond between the customer and your product. The savviest tech brands have made industries out of ambassador programs: Novel CNE and Microsoft MSCE are examples
  • And my personal favorite: having sales ask the question directly of their customers. If the answer is anything less than a yes, the reason needs to be tracked and managed.

Before you can manage your net promoter score, you need to establish a base line. So start asking your customers: would you recommend this product to a friend?

Resistance to Change

Sales and marketing professionals at technology companies often complain that IT customers are resistant to change. The evidence supporting this assertion ranges from customers turning down meeting requests to older products continuing in use despite the availability of newer versions.

The shocking truth is that, collectively, these stick-in-the-mud IT organizations are making many important changes. They are embracing Service Oriented Architecture, 64-bit computing, open source technology, outsourcing and mobile computing. They are exceeding demanding service levels for back office application availability and improving end user productivity. They are holding the line on costs, while helping their organizations achieve top-line and bottom-line growth.

Labeling customers as “resistant to change” is convenient, but the facts tell a different and more complex story. Many changes are taking place in these organizations every day. Many ideas and distractions arise to compete with the plan of record, but only a precious few earn much attention. Is the problem resistance to change or are vendor claims not inspiring decision-makers to change their plans?

Overcoming Resistance to Change: Look Inward

Human attitudes towards change result from a complex interplay of emotions and cognitive processes. We all make choices in our lives that result in changes to the status quo. We all cope and adapt to changes that happen in our environment and that impel a reaction.

Former University of California Chancellor Clark Kerr wisely stated “the status quo is the only solution that cannot be vetoed.” I believe that the status quo is what the disgruntled technology vendors are bemoaning. And, broadly speaking, the status quo plan of record appears to serve IT decision-makers quite well.

There is hope for disgruntled vendors, but it won’t come easy. While IT decision-makers are heavily dependent on IT vendors, they are also pragmatic and skeptical. They will resist products which are not aligned with their priorities. Time and time again, compelling, urgent and value-creating products are purchased, deployed, used and upgraded.

Look at your product portfolio. Resistance to change?

Security Hassles, Travel and the Internet Substitute

I’ve spent a lot of time on the Internet this week. My bounty is a lot of new information on web marketing, managerial effectiveness and salesmanship. All I can say is the research was enriching.

On Saturday I will travel by air to Los Angeles. I’m going to experience first-hand the differences between Air security and Internet security. Clearly there is more energy and more friction involved in air security.

As much as I enjoy the Internet, it is not a good replacement for face-to-face interactions. Yes, I predict that I’ll be grumpy about the wasted time in intolerable security lines. But it is a small price to pay to experience my LA friends and colleagues.

So the security angle is interesting. In a sense security raises the transaction price for transactions that are separated by geography. Perhaps the cost is one hour for each departure.

Economists will tell you that the higher security costs will drive the marginal traveler to seek substitutes such as the Internet. I assert there is a more important dynamic. If the number of trips (and the number of face-to-face interactions) declines, the value of each interaction increases.

I can write a lot of emails and do a lot of online research in an hour. But the expense to value ratio for the human interaction, in this case, skews toward travel. I’d be less productive without the Internet. I’d be less happy without travel.